From these personal descriptions, the concept of the table expands. As students analyse photos—paying attention to body language, gestures, eye contact—they come to see that tables are not just furniture, but social spaces where roles, values, and shared experiences take shape. This leads naturally to a reflection on public and institutional tables—particularly those within the European Union.
Students are introduced to different kinds of institutional tables: the circular table of the Court of Justice, where legal experts deliberate; the plenary chamber of the European Parliament, where elected representatives debate. Each layout reflects a particular structure of participation and decision-making, and students are encouraged to consider how these arrangements shape responsibility and power.
In the archives, however, we do not only find ‘formal’ institutional tables, but also informal moments of meeting and socialisation, as it happens in their personal tables. In addition to formal institutional settings, the workshop also introduces the concept of the informal table as an additional meaningful space for dialogue and connection at institutional events. To illustrate this, students are engaged in analysing two contrasting images of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB): one depicting its members seated around the official table at the ECB headquarters, and the other showing the same individuals gathered informally around a restaurant table.
These visual juxtapositions underscore that institutional dialogue does not occur exclusively within formal, protocol-bound environments. Informal tables – those in cafés, restaurants, or communal spaces – also serve as essential arenas for exchange, trust-building, and the formation of consensus. They remind us that democratic processes are sustained not only by institutional frameworks, but also by interpersonal relationships and informal interactions, where ideas, perspectives, and compromises often take shape in more spontaneous and human settings.
An example of the approach of the Educational Programme is the use of the offside rule in football to illustrate the legal basis underpinning the EU’s ordinary legislative procedure. The metaphor enables complex legal mechanisms to be made accessible through familiar and engaging frameworks, facilitating deeper understanding and long-term retention.
This methodological flexibility is especially valuable when addressing institutional or legal topics that might otherwise feel abstract or distant. Whether comparing legislative processes to the rules of a football match or using visual art to represent power dynamics, the Programme lowers barriers to understanding and sparks curiosity across age groups.
Importantly, this approach goes beyond simplification: it promotes critical thinking. By linking European governance to students’ personal experiences and cultural references, the Programme invites them to engage actively with key questions. Students are encouraged to ask, reflect, and challenge assumptions—developing not only knowledge of European democracy but also a sense of ownership and belonging within it.
Ultimately, this inclusive and imaginative pedagogy helps nurture a new generation of citizens who are not only informed about Europe, but empowered to shape its future.